首页> 外文期刊>The Navy >BOOK REVIEW
【24h】

BOOK REVIEW

机译:书评

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Nathan K. Finney is an officer in the U.S. Army studying history at Duke University. Tyrell 0. Mayfield is an Air Force officer currently commanding the USAF 72d Security Forces Squadron. This is an encouraging book; reflecting an evaluation of war, arguably at a time of conflict and growing operational demands on the U.S. and its allies. This book represents a period of reflection in the U.S. military; rightly winning plaudits, from the military great and the good (including General Dempsey) from U.S. and UK - which may be both a strength and a weakness. Ethics deals with morals and the principles of morality pertaining to right and wrong conduct and with actions being in accordance with the norms, rules or standards for right conduct or practice, such as the standards of a profession. The point being that the codification of a profession is about ethics, and ethics define the profession. This circularity works well in times of stability but not in times of uncertainty when sailors and soldiers need to think 'outside the box' and no amount of rules of engagement can determine right action and behaviour. Moreover, given their codification, ethics can also become doctrine and doctrinaire - preventing thinking. Napoleon commented that 'moral is to the physical as three is to one'. The pressing intersection is not between professions and ethics per se (which may be one and the same) but between ethics/professions and morality dealing with higher values for proper conduct. Whereas codes of conduct/ doctrine can be imposed, moral and values may not. This has to come from within. The U.S. military leads the way in examining decision making and taking through scenarios to get at these types of situations. But herein may lie another issue. Whereas the U.S. military and its allies might come together on values and morals, they have different ways of codifying these into professional ethics. It is this intersection that we may learn more from - and much harder, perhaps, to articulate. A great book and one that no doubt will become a primer for future staff officers.
机译:内森·芬尼(Nathan K.Finney)是美国陆军军官,在杜克大学(Duke University)学习历史。泰瑞尔0。梅菲尔德是现任美国空军72d安全部队中队的空军官员。这是一本令人鼓舞的书;反映了对战争的评估,可以说是在冲突时期以及对美国及其盟国的作战需求不断增加的时候。这本书代表了美军的反思期;正确地赢得了来自美国和英国的军事大人物和好人(包括登普西将军)的赞扬,这可能既有优势也有劣势。伦理学涉及与正确和错误行为有关的道德和道德原则,并根据正确行为或实践的规范,规则或标准(例如职业标准)来采取行动。关键是,职业的编纂是关于道德的,而道德则定义了职业。当稳定和稳定时,这种循环性很好,但是当水手和士兵需要“跳出框框”思考并且没有任何交战规则可以决定正确的行动和行为时,这种循环性就很好。此外,由于道德规范已被编纂,因此它们也可能成为教义和教义学派,从而妨碍了思考。拿破仑评论说,“道德是物质的,而道德是物质的”。紧迫的交集不是在职业与道德本身(可能是相同的)之间,而是在道德/职业与道德之间,这些道德/职业与道德处理着较高的行为规范价值。尽管可以实施行为准则/学说,但道德和价值观念却不能。这必须来自内部。美国军方在检查决策情况和通过设想方案来应对此类情况方面处于领先地位。但是这里可能存在另一个问题。尽管美国军方及其盟友可能会在价值观和道德上走到一起,但他们有不同的方式将其编入职业道德。在这个交叉路口,我们可能会学到更多,而且可能很难说清楚。一本好书,毫无疑问将成为未来职员的入门书。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Navy》 |2019年第3期|31-32|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号